Afge Master Agreement Article 21

For this reason, on 3 February 1999, AFGE, Local 940, formally requested that the consequences and implementation of the defendant`s decision on the implementation of POPs be negotiated in accordance with Article 44 of the mid-term negotiating article of the Parties Treaty. 4. The parties are designated as representatives to be negotiated. The parties met and exchanged proposals for three days on February 10, 11 and 16, 1999. On February 16, 1999, VA Center AFGE, Local 940, submitted another proposal. Va Center chief negotiator Donald Taylor said the negotiations were “over,” and he stood up and exited when the parties had not reached an agreement or a stalemate. AFGE, Local 940 has requested that negotiations resume with the help of a mediator. Va Center refused and, on February 24, 1999, Taylor sent an email to the Union stating that the Development Centre was not required to negotiate because the matter was covered by an agreement. (5) In the e-mail, Taylor announced that the change in the service requirement for IT operators would take effect on March 15, 1999. On February 16, 1999, the VA Center ended negotiations on its decision to cover POP 24/7, when Taylor, the VA Centre`s chief negotiator, abruptly announced that the CENTRE WAS “finished” to negotiate. Almost immediately, AFGE, Local 940, requested that negotiations continue with the assistance of a federal mediator.

Taylor objected on the grounds that the obligation to negotiate was not mandatory for VA Center, since the object in question was inoperable. On March 15, 1999, the VA Center implemented its decision when 10 of the 18 IT operators qualified for this work were permanently assigned to a new mission that it had to work on for the first time on the weekend. Prior to the implementation of this change, IT operators had been working on a Monday-Friday schedule and had never been permanently used to work a weekend. agreement. We have also indicated that we would not need specific correspondence of the language, but we will find that the issue is covered by the provision of the agreement. Id. to 1165. To allay concerns that articles could not be negotiated in the medium term, the parties would have agreed, in the last sentence of Article 44, paragraph 1, paragraph (c), that if there was a subject in the Ma on which the parties wished to prevent further negotiations, the specific article would contain a language to exclude any negotiations on this particular subject.

Both Mr. Gage and Mr. Perkins played an important role in the Section 44 negotiations. Your statement makes it clear that the parties intended to give the Union the right to negotiate at the local level all the issues dealt with in the treaty. Mr. Gage testified that the preliminary work of section 44 was set out “by” declarations of waiver of Article 43, in which the Union had the right to negotiate matters in its local endorsements already covered by the treaty.

Comments are closed.