City Of Portland Franchise Agreements

The Charter of Portland City allows the city to act with the power of the state; The statutes empower the city to regulate procurement services; and charter regulations allow the city to order a free relocation if the move is made for the common good. a. Unless otherwise imposed by the municipal charter, the Office maintains a separate protocol on each franchise granted by the Commission, including: The first step to obtaining authority is to provide the PTOS with succinct information on the nature of the proposed activities and facilities on the roads. Get a full description of the requested information. Once the information is obtained, PTOM staff may convene a preliminary meeting. The meeting is an opportunity for staff and applicants to gather additional information. Franchises can last between six months and a year or more, depending on their complexity. Once a final agreement has been reached on the content of the franchise, the process takes at least four months (by Portland Charter). First, the entire franchise is published in the Daily Journal of Commerce. After twenty days, the franchise goes to the city council for the first reading. After an additional 30 days, the deductible will be sent to the City Council for second reading.

Assuming that the Serb by the Council, the franchise will again be effective sixty days later. A temporary withdrawal authorization may be granted as long as the deductible comes into effect. Please note that many of the provisions of the City Charter or the City Code are required. Potential franchisees are invited to read one or more of the current franchises listed below prior to the preliminary meeting. 1. franchisee compliance with applicable franchise provisions; Instead of using an unenforceable distinction to resolve the complainants` Count I complaint, we analyze this problem using state laws, applicable municipal charters, and specific settlements and agreements made by the parties. The Portland Charter also provided for specific areas open to local legislation. Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 73. These areas included the location of water pipes and the installation of water and lighting for the city. Section 73 (12) expressly authorized the City to issue GNP facilities in Portland under a revocable authorization granted in 1932 to its predecessor, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company. Unlike the franchise under which NNG operates, the revocable authorization was not silent on the issue of relocation.

Section 7 of the authorization states in a relevant section: the stadtwerke argue that the city`s attempt to require free relocation is the limitation of the general rule that is in place in Multnomah County v. Rockwood W. Dist. it is mentioned above, because the construction of the LRT system by Tri-Met, which is characterized by public services, is the exercise of a selfish function and not a governmental function.


Comments are closed.